Ultimately, though there may be several protocols to choose from (whether from the classical or practical perspective), it is easy to see how the Banerji system streamlines the process and makes it easier having a single one for each diagnosis makes the process of selecting a homeopathic potency and frequency much simpler. This year's influenza strain is different from last year's, which was different from the year before, and so on. Human health is constantly changing, and different strains of illnesses will continue to pass through populations from year to year. A protocol that has a high level of effectiveness at one point in time might be overshadowed by a different protocol at a different point in time. But … not all of them will work perfectly for all people, all of the time.įurthermore, there’s the important element of time. While one person swears by Echinacea, another prefers garlic, and a third finds that infusions of vitamin C, essential oils and vitamin D are most effective.Īll of these methods work, and most of them will work well for most people. I often use the example of botanicals for a common cold or virus. The same is true with traditional Chinese medicine or Naturopathy. If you go to an allopathic medical doctor, two people with the same condition might receive different pharmaceutical recommendations based on each doctor’s experience and individual proclivity. We see this in almost every form of medicine. Both work well it’s just a matter of each doctor's personal preference. Pratip Banerji (who practices in the next room over), uses a completely different one. Prasanta Banerji uses one specific protocol while his son, Dr. I learned that when it comes to rheumatoid arthritis, Dr. Two different protocols, both extremely useful for addressing scar tissue. He altered his medicine choice, at least for this particular patient. Pratip Banerji turned to me and asked, “Joette, what do you use for scar tissue?” I answered, “I use Thiosinaminum 6, twice daily.” Banerji had been using Nitricum acidum 200 every 3 days but after a considerable amount of time (around 6 months), there was no discernible change.ĭr. One time, I observed a man who presented with severe scar tissue. I wanted to make sure I never got it wrong, made assumptions, or misunderstood the particulars (even though I always read the remedies straight from the page the doctors wrote it on.) I did this for a total of 6,528 cases over the last 3 years.Įvery single one was different, and I made sure to document each of them because I suspected I might miss something vital if I didn't. I wouldn’t just say to myself, “Oh, I’ve already got a kidney case written down.” No! Again, I’d write down all of the information related to the case every minutiae detail. Ten minutes later, another kidney failure case might come in. Throughout the course of my studies, my notes reflected the eventual protocol I would choose.įor instance, if I saw a case of kidney failure, I’d write down the client’s age, gender, diagnosis, which homeopathics had been used previously and those currently being prescribed, along with whatever pharmaceutical drugs or medicines the person was taking at the time. When I observe the Banerji methods at their busy research center/clinic, I am careful to take detailed and specific notes. I also consult the Banerji Protocol book and I often ask the Banerji’s and the other doctors who I now consider my friends. My primary sources are my personal transcripts of what I observed and recorded at the Banerji Research Foundation Clinic during my multiple visits to Kolkata, India. When it comes to the Banerji protocols, the information I give comes from a few different sources. As the saying goes, “there is more than one way to skin a cat,” and it’s beneficial to have knowledge of those other ways. However, when students and followers of my blog come across multiple protocols for the same condition, they often get confused.Īlthough at first glance this may seem confusing, let me assure you it’s a good thing. My readers have gotten used to the idea that I recommend following the Banerji protocols exactly as they are, without changes or substitutions, and that’s a good thing – I’m very happy that my message has gotten through on that point. People also ask, “Why is there a difference between such and such protocol (from the Banerji book for example) and this other protocol that you’ve given (on my blog or in a class perhaps) for the same condition?” Would you recommend that I focus on the remedies from the course rather than the book?” “Should I be concerned that the remedies outlined in the Good Gut, Bad Gut course, your blog and other writings, and the Banerji book seem different? Today I’d like to address a particular type of question I'm often asked.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |